GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
English language

Home | MyGov

Accessibility
Accessibility Tools
Color Adjustment
Text Size
Navigation Adjustment
Screen Reader iconScreen Reader
Menus
Sticky Menu

Inviting suggestions on list of 469 items reserved for exclusive purchase from MSEs under Public Procurement Policy

Inviting suggestions on list of 469 items reserved for exclusive purchase from MSEs under Public Procurement Policy
Start Date :
Nov 01, 2022
Last Date :
Nov 30, 2022
23:45 PM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
Submission Closed

The Central Government Ministries/ Departments and Central Public Sector Undertaking are mandated to procure 25% (as amended in 2018) of their annual value of goods or services ...

The Central Government Ministries/ Departments and Central Public Sector Undertaking are mandated to procure 25% (as amended in 2018) of their annual value of goods or services from micro and small enterprises vide Public Procurement Order Notified vide S.O. 581 (E) dated 23rd March 2012. Under the policy, 358 items are exclusively reserved for procurement from MSEs which help in the promotion and growth of Micro and Small Enterprises and play a critical role in fostering inclusive growth in the country.

The existing list required a relook to find out the relevance in the present-day context of technological change, and the growth of small and micro enterprises. The Internal Technical Committee of the Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises has prepared a revised list of 469 items (including Goods & Services) to be reserved for exclusive procurement from MSEs.

Stakeholders, Industries associations, MSME units and the General public are invited to share their suggestions and comments on the list of 469 items reserved for exclusive purchase from MSEs under the Public Procurement Policy.

Please click here to refer to the list of 469 items reserved for exclusive purchase from MSEs under the Public Procurement Policy. (PDF 272 KB)

Last date to submit suggestions is 30 November 2022.

Reset
Showing 604 Submission(s)
Santanu Datta
Santanu Datta 3 years 11 months ago
One district one product and based on that product atleast one MSME by govt. or pp model or coaperative can solve lot of problems. Based on this basic principle govt. should proceed.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Comments (1)
SANJAY SARKAR
SANJAY SARKAR 3 years 11 months ago
It is not correct to say that about 200 items which are reserved, are not produced in the SSI Sector (as revealed by Second All India Census). It was clarified that an enquiry was made with State Governments, Associations which revealed that many of these items are produced in the SSI Sector and it was due to some technical reason in the interpretation of registration of items by Directorate of Industries that these items could not be listed as independent items under production by the SSI units. 
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Comments (1)
SANJAY SARKAR
SANJAY SARKAR 3 years 11 months ago
There is no complaint against the quality of the goods produced in the SSI Sector as is evident from the fact that, at present, this sector is the largest contributor of Indian exports.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Comments (1)
SANJAY SARKAR
SANJAY SARKAR 3 years 11 months ago
There is no complaint against the quality of the goods produced in the SSI Sector as is evident from the fact that, at present, this sector is the largest contributor of Indian exports.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Comments (1)
SANJAY SARKAR
SANJAY SARKAR 3 years 11 months ago
In the context of liberalised regime the need for reservation has assumed added importance because the sector is now more exposed to competition from large scale sector including multi-nationals and also due to drastic reduction in protection as result of lowering down of excise and customs duties.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Comments (1)
SANJAY SARKAR
SANJAY SARKAR 3 years 11 months ago
The committee heard the Industrial Advisors and Directors of the Office of the DC(SSI) and representatives of various Departments viz. Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Department of Chemicals, Leather Associations etc. It may be mentioned that the officers of the office of Development Commissioner who attended the meetings strongly opposed any move for Dereservation of any items on the ground that :
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Comments (1)
SANJAY SARKAR
SANJAY SARKAR 3 years 11 months ago
In the first meeting, the Committee discussed and decided upon the general approach to be followed by it in its review of the reserved list. At its meeting, it was also decided that the concerned Advisors/Directors in the Office of the DC(SSI) and representatives of the concerned Central Ministries should be invited to attend the meeting of the Committee as and when items relating to their area of working were taken up for review.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Comments (1)
SANJAY SARKAR
SANJAY SARKAR 3 years 11 months ago
Notes on specific items were also received from Shri B. Bhanot also a member of the committee. The notes received from Industrial Advisers/Directors of DC(SSI) against the dereservation of particular items were also considered by the committee.
Dislike (0)
Reply
Report Spam
Comments (1)
Sticky Menu