Measure what the humans value Since the real costs of extensive risks have undervalued for so long and this gap is only widening, it is important that we measure what we value. Some of the key actions under this idea are to: Reworking financial systems to account for the real costs of risk, particularly long-term risks, and rework investment and insurance systems to incentivize risk reduction. Adapting national fiscal planning and risk financing to consider risk and uncertainty

Reconfigure governance and financial systems to work across design in consultation with the disaster affected people Under this, goverments and financial systems must embrace transdisciplinary methods and work across silos and design in consultation with affectred groups. Some of the jey actions under this idea are to: Embrace a new “risk language” that cuts across multiple disciplines. Step up participation, transparency and citizen dialogue in risk decision-making to accelerate learning and necessary adjustments. Enhancing multi-scale risk management

Recognise the people’s perception of risks to mend the gap between intention and action taking during risk situations. Recognising the data analytics value where governments can invest and develop quality models with mehtods drawn on local knowledge, community feedback and expert opinion

- Under this, lawmakers and disaster risk reduction service providers and household communities come in to assess the risk perceptions including cognitive biases, decision making, etc. Two key actions under this idea are to:

It goes wothout saying that the global stability is at risk along with recognisable challenges to economy and environment. Conventional apporaches to mitigate the disasters by far have had lesser impacts, so syhstematic risk governance needs to develop causal structures, dynamic responses to tackle the global systemic risk.

According to the Global Assessment Report on disaster risk reduction (GAR2022), If current trends continue, the number of disasters per year globally may increase from around 400 in 2015 to 560 per year by 2030 – a projected increase of 40% during the lifetime of the Sendai Framework Also it estimates that the number of extreme temperature events per year is also increasing, and based on current trends will almost triple between 2001 and 2030. Disasters have negative impacts on biodiversity and environmental sustainability. These trends and numbers miss to calculate the ongoing climate chnage influences that are accelerating which is leading to unpredictable disaster forecasts.

Mitigating Disaster Risks Mitigation from any natural calamity or man-made disaster is very important while thinking about global sustainability options. Disaster mitigation is a group effort to lessen the impact of disasters on people and property. It means working on disaster-resilient infrastructure, enforcing effective aids to tackle calamity-prone situations, etc.

According to recent data, an average carbon footprint of a person in India is 0.56 tonnes per year, compared to the global average of 4 tonnes. India's traditional knowledge, social norms and daily household practices strongly position it to take on individual action to tackle the climate change issue through this mass movement in the form of ‘LiFe Mission.’

As India comprises more than 65% of the youth majority, they can actively contribute to the Lifestyle for Environment (LiFe) initiative. Additionally, ‘LiFe’ seeks to implement such foundation techniques into the regular habit to have a more powerful impact.

The ‘LiFe’ initiative makes the fight against climate change historically democratic where every citizen plays a key role. It aims to inspire the citizens and communities to lead a lifestyle that is in close synchrony with nature’s limited resources and help minimise any exhaustion of those resources. A model of production and consumption that entails industries and markets adopting the concept of ‘reduce, reuse, recycle.’